<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GPS Units Will Make Attractive Planters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jetwhine.com/2007/05/gps-units-will-make-attractive-planters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jetwhine.com/2007/05/gps-units-will-make-attractive-planters/</link>
	<description>Aviation buzz and bold opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:19:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Retired_ATC</title>
		<link>http://www.jetwhine.com/2007/05/gps-units-will-make-attractive-planters/comment-page-1/#comment-9554</link>
		<dc:creator>Retired_ATC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 05:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jetwhine.com/2007/05/gps-units-will-make-attractive-planters/#comment-9554</guid>
		<description>&quot;On purpose would mean they even gave the effects of their decision on users so much as a moment’s thought, which I doubt.&quot;  

Oh I&#039;m sure it was on purpose, only the responsible parties didn&#039;t even understand the impact on the users, so much for given it a moment&#039;s thought.  A typo error is a good excuse to use if you believe them.  Ms. Blakey and her mismanagment team have done a real &quot;job&quot; on reorganizing the FAA, so much that major loss of technical and professional experience is rampant.  What was once the best and most professional federal agency has become a joke.  But not to worry, more to come as the situation develops at the FAA/ATO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;On purpose would mean they even gave the effects of their decision on users so much as a moment’s thought, which I doubt.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Oh I&#8217;m sure it was on purpose, only the responsible parties didn&#8217;t even understand the impact on the users, so much for given it a moment&#8217;s thought.  A typo error is a good excuse to use if you believe them.  Ms. Blakey and her mismanagment team have done a real &#8220;job&#8221; on reorganizing the FAA, so much that major loss of technical and professional experience is rampant.  What was once the best and most professional federal agency has become a joke.  But not to worry, more to come as the situation develops at the FAA/ATO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
