<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kate Hanni: Why We Still Need an Airline Passenger Bill of Rights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jetwhine.com/2007/12/kate-hanni-why-we-still-need-an-airline-passenger-bill-of-rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jetwhine.com/2007/12/kate-hanni-why-we-still-need-an-airline-passenger-bill-of-rights/</link>
	<description>Aviation buzz and bold opinion</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 03:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Airline Chaos - It&#8217;s the Customer &#8230; to Some Degree Dummy - Jetwhine: Aviation Buzz and Bold Opinon</title>
		<link>http://www.jetwhine.com/2007/12/kate-hanni-why-we-still-need-an-airline-passenger-bill-of-rights/#comment-23638</link>
		<dc:creator>Airline Chaos - It&#8217;s the Customer &#8230; to Some Degree Dummy - Jetwhine: Aviation Buzz and Bold Opinon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 20:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jetwhine.com/2007/12/kate-hanni-why-we-still-need-an-airline-passenger-bill-of-rights/#comment-23638</guid>
		<description>[...] Remember the piece I posted on Kate Hanni and the Coalition for an Airline Passenger Bill of Rights a few weeks back? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Remember the piece I posted on Kate Hanni and the Coalition for an Airline Passenger Bill of Rights a few weeks back? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Southwest Airlines &#8230; Thank You - Jetwhine: Aviation Buzz and Bold Opinon</title>
		<link>http://www.jetwhine.com/2007/12/kate-hanni-why-we-still-need-an-airline-passenger-bill-of-rights/#comment-22844</link>
		<dc:creator>Southwest Airlines &#8230; Thank You - Jetwhine: Aviation Buzz and Bold Opinon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 01:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jetwhine.com/2007/12/kate-hanni-why-we-still-need-an-airline-passenger-bill-of-rights/#comment-22844</guid>
		<description>[...] Friday&#8217;s Jetwhine posts proves yet again, I simply love to tweak the nose of practically every airline in the U.S. They [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Friday&#8217;s Jetwhine posts proves yet again, I simply love to tweak the nose of practically every airline in the U.S. They [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.jetwhine.com/2007/12/kate-hanni-why-we-still-need-an-airline-passenger-bill-of-rights/#comment-22692</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 18:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jetwhine.com/2007/12/kate-hanni-why-we-still-need-an-airline-passenger-bill-of-rights/#comment-22692</guid>
		<description>One way to get the airlines' attention: if it's a trip under a thousand miles, take Amtrak. Anyone can get on the California Zephyr, which leaves Union Station at 3:30 in the afternoon, and be at Denver's Union Station by 9:00 the next morning. And the train can travel in weather that will leave airplanes (and passengers) sitting on the ground. Did I mention that your luggage gets there with you?

If the airlines start getting a little outside competition and there's even more jets sitting in that desert graveyard in Arizona, they'll change their tune. And those who think that the federal government shouldn't be in the business of subsidizing rail travel conveniently forget that lucrative contracts to carry U.S. Post Office Air Mail kept the airlines afloat in the early decades of this century. In fact, it wasn't until the mid-thirties that they actually started making more money carrying passengers than mail.

Okay, I'm down off the soapbox. But it's amazing how many people never even consider taking the train, under any circumstances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One way to get the airlines&#8217; attention: if it&#8217;s a trip under a thousand miles, take Amtrak. Anyone can get on the California Zephyr, which leaves Union Station at 3:30 in the afternoon, and be at Denver&#8217;s Union Station by 9:00 the next morning. And the train can travel in weather that will leave airplanes (and passengers) sitting on the ground. Did I mention that your luggage gets there with you?</p>
<p>If the airlines start getting a little outside competition and there&#8217;s even more jets sitting in that desert graveyard in Arizona, they&#8217;ll change their tune. And those who think that the federal government shouldn&#8217;t be in the business of subsidizing rail travel conveniently forget that lucrative contracts to carry U.S. Post Office Air Mail kept the airlines afloat in the early decades of this century. In fact, it wasn&#8217;t until the mid-thirties that they actually started making more money carrying passengers than mail.</p>
<p>Okay, I&#8217;m down off the soapbox. But it&#8217;s amazing how many people never even consider taking the train, under any circumstances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate Hanni</title>
		<link>http://www.jetwhine.com/2007/12/kate-hanni-why-we-still-need-an-airline-passenger-bill-of-rights/#comment-22649</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate Hanni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 01:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jetwhine.com/2007/12/kate-hanni-why-we-still-need-an-airline-passenger-bill-of-rights/#comment-22649</guid>
		<description>Well Santa Clause came early to Airline Passengers' in 2007.  The New York Airline Passengers' Bill of Rights has been upheld in court and Judge Kahn saw through the absurdity of the ATA's arguments that passengers don't deserve a cup of water, a granola bar, hygienic toilets and air conditioning.  
 
The Coalition, represented by Kate Hanni, was there for the hearing, and it was clear that the airlines have a Callous Disregard for the Airline Passengers that buy their tickets on their airlines expecting basic human needs to be met, and a certain level of dignity, which is rarely if ever provided during long on ground delays.
 
"The Coalition hopes that other states move quickly to adopt similar Health and Safety measures to provide airline passengers' basic needs, and moreover that this will pressure the Federal Government and Congress into finally acting on behalf of the flying public that elected them!" Stated Kate Hanni, Founder
 
"The Coalition for an airline passengers' Bill of Rights may now claim it's first victory for passengers'....but we have a long road ahead for uniform standards throughout the United States to protect the flying public."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Santa Clause came early to Airline Passengers&#8217; in 2007.  The New York Airline Passengers&#8217; Bill of Rights has been upheld in court and Judge Kahn saw through the absurdity of the ATA&#8217;s arguments that passengers don&#8217;t deserve a cup of water, a granola bar, hygienic toilets and air conditioning.  </p>
<p>The Coalition, represented by Kate Hanni, was there for the hearing, and it was clear that the airlines have a Callous Disregard for the Airline Passengers that buy their tickets on their airlines expecting basic human needs to be met, and a certain level of dignity, which is rarely if ever provided during long on ground delays.</p>
<p>&#8220;The Coalition hopes that other states move quickly to adopt similar Health and Safety measures to provide airline passengers&#8217; basic needs, and moreover that this will pressure the Federal Government and Congress into finally acting on behalf of the flying public that elected them!&#8221; Stated Kate Hanni, Founder</p>
<p>&#8220;The Coalition for an airline passengers&#8217; Bill of Rights may now claim it&#8217;s first victory for passengers&#8217;&#8230;.but we have a long road ahead for uniform standards throughout the United States to protect the flying public.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
