<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Homebuilt Aircraft: How Much is More than Half?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jetwhine.com/2008/02/homebuilt-aircraft-how-much-is-more-than-half/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jetwhine.com/2008/02/homebuilt-aircraft-how-much-is-more-than-half/</link>
	<description>Aviation buzz and bold opinion</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 01:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Grandfathered Kits Don&#8217;t Guarantee Amateur-Built Certification - Jetwhine: Aviation Buzz and Bold Opinon</title>
		<link>http://www.jetwhine.com/2008/02/homebuilt-aircraft-how-much-is-more-than-half/#comment-31560</link>
		<dc:creator>Grandfathered Kits Don&#8217;t Guarantee Amateur-Built Certification - Jetwhine: Aviation Buzz and Bold Opinon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jetwhine.com/2008/02/homebuilt-aircraft-how-much-is-more-than-half/#comment-31560</guid>
		<description>[...] since the FAA formed an aviation rulemaking committee to take a look at the 51-percent rule (see Homebuilt Aircraft: How Much is More than Half?) Especially anxious were the manufacturers and builders of aircraft on the FAA&#8217;s list [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] since the FAA formed an aviation rulemaking committee to take a look at the 51-percent rule (see Homebuilt Aircraft: How Much is More than Half?) Especially anxious were the manufacturers and builders of aircraft on the FAA&#8217;s list [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
