<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Homebuilt Aircraft: How Much is More than Half?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jetwhine.com/2008/02/homebuilt-aircraft-how-much-is-more-than-half/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jetwhine.com/2008/02/homebuilt-aircraft-how-much-is-more-than-half/</link>
	<description>Aviation buzz and bold opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 16:27:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Proposed Policy Doesn&#8217;t Solve Homebuilt Problem - Jetwhine: Aviation Buzz and Bold Opinion</title>
		<link>http://www.jetwhine.com/2008/02/homebuilt-aircraft-how-much-is-more-than-half/comment-page-1/#comment-41596</link>
		<dc:creator>Proposed Policy Doesn&#8217;t Solve Homebuilt Problem - Jetwhine: Aviation Buzz and Bold Opinion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 15:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jetwhine.com/2008/02/homebuilt-aircraft-how-much-is-more-than-half/#comment-41596</guid>
		<description>[...] If my homebuilding buddies are a typical sample of the amateur-built airplane community, there&#8217;s a lot of confusion about what led to the new policy the FAA has proposed. (See Homebuilt Aircraft: How Much is More than Half?) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If my homebuilding buddies are a typical sample of the amateur-built airplane community, there&#8217;s a lot of confusion about what led to the new policy the FAA has proposed. (See Homebuilt Aircraft: How Much is More than Half?) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grandfathered Kits Don&#8217;t Guarantee Amateur-Built Certification - Jetwhine: Aviation Buzz and Bold Opinon</title>
		<link>http://www.jetwhine.com/2008/02/homebuilt-aircraft-how-much-is-more-than-half/comment-page-1/#comment-31560</link>
		<dc:creator>Grandfathered Kits Don&#8217;t Guarantee Amateur-Built Certification - Jetwhine: Aviation Buzz and Bold Opinon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jetwhine.com/2008/02/homebuilt-aircraft-how-much-is-more-than-half/#comment-31560</guid>
		<description>[...] since the FAA formed an aviation rulemaking committee to take a look at the 51-percent rule (see Homebuilt Aircraft: How Much is More than Half?) Especially anxious were the manufacturers and builders of aircraft on the FAA&#8217;s list [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] since the FAA formed an aviation rulemaking committee to take a look at the 51-percent rule (see Homebuilt Aircraft: How Much is More than Half?) Especially anxious were the manufacturers and builders of aircraft on the FAA&#8217;s list [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.jetwhine.com @ 2012-02-08 18:58:49 -->
