<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CAP Helped F-16s Follow Canadian Skyhawk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jetwhine.com/2009/04/cap-helped-f-16s-follow-canadian-skyhawk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jetwhine.com/2009/04/cap-helped-f-16s-follow-canadian-skyhawk/</link>
	<description>Aviation buzz and bold opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 16:27:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Mal Gormley</title>
		<link>http://www.jetwhine.com/2009/04/cap-helped-f-16s-follow-canadian-skyhawk/comment-page-1/#comment-68850</link>
		<dc:creator>Mal Gormley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jetwhine.com/2009/04/cap-helped-f-16s-follow-canadian-skyhawk/#comment-68850</guid>
		<description>Hmmm.. I won&#039;t venture a guess about guns vs missiles, but the scenario has me wondering why the ANG isn&#039;t using helicopters for this kind of thing. Either that or maybe we should consider buying some old P-51s, Bearcats or F-86s and refitting them for the role. After all, they&#039;ve already proved they would be more than capable of handling such low-and-slow air assault situations, while saving our tax dollars for more important uses.

Bottom line? This guy was simply a nut case and has received more than his fifteen minutes of fame. Can we move on now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm.. I won&#8217;t venture a guess about guns vs missiles, but the scenario has me wondering why the ANG isn&#8217;t using helicopters for this kind of thing. Either that or maybe we should consider buying some old P-51s, Bearcats or F-86s and refitting them for the role. After all, they&#8217;ve already proved they would be more than capable of handling such low-and-slow air assault situations, while saving our tax dollars for more important uses.</p>
<p>Bottom line? This guy was simply a nut case and has received more than his fifteen minutes of fame. Can we move on now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.jetwhine.com @ 2012-02-08 17:51:38 -->
