<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Iowans Support Their Small Airports</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jetwhine.com/2009/06/iowans-support-their-small-airports/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jetwhine.com/2009/06/iowans-support-their-small-airports/</link>
	<description>Aviation buzz and bold opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 16:27:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Olson</title>
		<link>http://www.jetwhine.com/2009/06/iowans-support-their-small-airports/comment-page-1/#comment-82435</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Olson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jetwhine.com/2009/06/iowans-support-their-small-airports/#comment-82435</guid>
		<description>Scott,

With a name like Scott you can&#039;t be all bad.  I wanted to thank you for your message on Jetwhine about Iowa airports receiving FAA funds.  The Des Moines news papers should have someone on staff that can review general aviation news content.  I am President of EAA Chapter 1452 and will pass your words on to our Iowa members.
Scott Olson, The Online Barnstormer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,</p>
<p>With a name like Scott you can&#8217;t be all bad.  I wanted to thank you for your message on Jetwhine about Iowa airports receiving FAA funds.  The Des Moines news papers should have someone on staff that can review general aviation news content.  I am President of EAA Chapter 1452 and will pass your words on to our Iowa members.<br />
Scott Olson, The Online Barnstormer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.jetwhine.com/2009/06/iowans-support-their-small-airports/comment-page-1/#comment-80648</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jetwhine.com/2009/06/iowans-support-their-small-airports/#comment-80648</guid>
		<description>Acutally, I&#039;m not making an argument one way or another. Airports--big ones and little ones--benefit many more Americans beyond the passengers and pilots that are they most visible users. Right now airport improvements are funded by money from fuel and passenger taxes, a small contribution from the general tax fund, and a contribution from the state. This seems to be the most most efficient way for indirect beneficiaries to contribute to their maintenance and improvements. 

User fees are another way to fund this, but given that the government is all about the bureaucracy, how high will the fees have to be to pay all of the papershufflers who will administer it. Equally important, how will the indrect users, from people who ship and receive overnight packages to life flights, make their contributions? 

There&#039;s no denying that we all get what we pay for, and the question is who shall pay, and who shall benefit? What concerns me most is American&#039;s growing short-sightedness. Our infrastructure is crumbling due to neglect, and when it comes to airports, an unequitiable funding structure will only exacerbate this problem. 

The final question relating to direct participation taxation or user fees is this: What will happen to airports we all benefit from when, because of unfair taxation or fees, there are insufficient direct users to charge?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Acutally, I&#8217;m not making an argument one way or another. Airports&#8211;big ones and little ones&#8211;benefit many more Americans beyond the passengers and pilots that are they most visible users. Right now airport improvements are funded by money from fuel and passenger taxes, a small contribution from the general tax fund, and a contribution from the state. This seems to be the most most efficient way for indirect beneficiaries to contribute to their maintenance and improvements. </p>
<p>User fees are another way to fund this, but given that the government is all about the bureaucracy, how high will the fees have to be to pay all of the papershufflers who will administer it. Equally important, how will the indrect users, from people who ship and receive overnight packages to life flights, make their contributions? </p>
<p>There&#8217;s no denying that we all get what we pay for, and the question is who shall pay, and who shall benefit? What concerns me most is American&#8217;s growing short-sightedness. Our infrastructure is crumbling due to neglect, and when it comes to airports, an unequitiable funding structure will only exacerbate this problem. </p>
<p>The final question relating to direct participation taxation or user fees is this: What will happen to airports we all benefit from when, because of unfair taxation or fees, there are insufficient direct users to charge?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DisgruntledFlyer</title>
		<link>http://www.jetwhine.com/2009/06/iowans-support-their-small-airports/comment-page-1/#comment-80626</link>
		<dc:creator>DisgruntledFlyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jetwhine.com/2009/06/iowans-support-their-small-airports/#comment-80626</guid>
		<description>So, let&#039;s be clear... your argument is that the expenditures on GA airports are entirely offset by tax revenue from GA owners / operators?

Sounds like what-you-pay-is-what-you-get (WYPIWYG, wippy-wig?)... so why the hubbub about user fees?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, let&#8217;s be clear&#8230; your argument is that the expenditures on GA airports are entirely offset by tax revenue from GA owners / operators?</p>
<p>Sounds like what-you-pay-is-what-you-get (WYPIWYG, wippy-wig?)&#8230; so why the hubbub about user fees?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.jetwhine.com/2009/06/iowans-support-their-small-airports/comment-page-1/#comment-80612</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jetwhine.com/2009/06/iowans-support-their-small-airports/#comment-80612</guid>
		<description>Scott,

Thanks for featuring this article.  Iowa has a very unique community, and a fairly active aviation presence.  I must admit that I missed this article, but it is good to see the discussions taking place.  Thanks for sharing

John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,</p>
<p>Thanks for featuring this article.  Iowa has a very unique community, and a fairly active aviation presence.  I must admit that I missed this article, but it is good to see the discussions taking place.  Thanks for sharing</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.jetwhine.com @ 2012-02-08 15:48:50 -->
