<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Internet &amp; Homebuilt Aircraft Accidents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jetwhine.com/2010/02/the-internet-homebuilt-aircraft-accidents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jetwhine.com/2010/02/the-internet-homebuilt-aircraft-accidents/</link>
	<description>Aviation buzz and bold opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 16:27:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Hans</title>
		<link>http://www.jetwhine.com/2010/02/the-internet-homebuilt-aircraft-accidents/comment-page-1/#comment-137056</link>
		<dc:creator>Hans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 10:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jetwhine.com/2010/02/the-internet-homebuilt-aircraft-accidents/#comment-137056</guid>
		<description>Excellent article.  Recent information published by Sport Aviations seems to indicate that especially high performance experimentals - equipped with modern glass cockpits - are more prone to such accidents as more conventional experimentals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article.  Recent information published by Sport Aviations seems to indicate that especially high performance experimentals &#8211; equipped with modern glass cockpits &#8211; are more prone to such accidents as more conventional experimentals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pilots Aren’t Perfect &#38; Flying is Not Risk Free &#124; RENT-A-PLANE</title>
		<link>http://www.jetwhine.com/2010/02/the-internet-homebuilt-aircraft-accidents/comment-page-1/#comment-131996</link>
		<dc:creator>Pilots Aren’t Perfect &#38; Flying is Not Risk Free &#124; RENT-A-PLANE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 08:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jetwhine.com/2010/02/the-internet-homebuilt-aircraft-accidents/#comment-131996</guid>
		<description>[...] record of amateur-built experimental aircraft, and comments about my recent post on this subject (The Internet &amp; Homebuilt Aircraft Accidents), led to the somber reflection that is the headline [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] record of amateur-built experimental aircraft, and comments about my recent post on this subject (The Internet &amp; Homebuilt Aircraft Accidents), led to the somber reflection that is the headline [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pilots Aren&#8217;t Perfect &#38; Flying is Not Risk Free - Jetwhine: Aviation Buzz and Bold Opinion</title>
		<link>http://www.jetwhine.com/2010/02/the-internet-homebuilt-aircraft-accidents/comment-page-1/#comment-131918</link>
		<dc:creator>Pilots Aren&#8217;t Perfect &#38; Flying is Not Risk Free - Jetwhine: Aviation Buzz and Bold Opinion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 03:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jetwhine.com/2010/02/the-internet-homebuilt-aircraft-accidents/#comment-131918</guid>
		<description>[...] record of amateur-built experimental aircraft, and comments about my recent post on this subject (The Internet &amp; Homebuilt Aircraft Accidents), led to the somber reflection that is the headline [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] record of amateur-built experimental aircraft, and comments about my recent post on this subject (The Internet &amp; Homebuilt Aircraft Accidents), led to the somber reflection that is the headline [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Accidents involving homebuilt aircraft rise sharply - Golf Hotel Whiskey</title>
		<link>http://www.jetwhine.com/2010/02/the-internet-homebuilt-aircraft-accidents/comment-page-1/#comment-131745</link>
		<dc:creator>Accidents involving homebuilt aircraft rise sharply - Golf Hotel Whiskey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jetwhine.com/2010/02/the-internet-homebuilt-aircraft-accidents/#comment-131745</guid>
		<description>[...] Spangler on the Jetwhine blog has recently noted an interesting statistic: According to the results of the 2009 Nall Report [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Spangler on the Jetwhine blog has recently noted an interesting statistic: According to the results of the 2009 Nall Report [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.jetwhine.com/2010/02/the-internet-homebuilt-aircraft-accidents/comment-page-1/#comment-126884</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 04:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jetwhine.com/2010/02/the-internet-homebuilt-aircraft-accidents/#comment-126884</guid>
		<description>Analysis requires accurate data, which no one is collecting. Maybe the growing accident rate will change this. Until now, most seemed content with anecdotal evidense and whet-finger estimations. 

I, too, would like to see the break down between builder and second owner, and add those airplanes built by hired guns for pilots with more money than time. 

Another interesting data point would be flight time, both total, last 30 to 90 days, and time in type. The old saw is that builders are too busy working to fly, until their project is done. 

To be honest, mechanical ability doesn&#039;t have a lot to do with building and airplane today because most of them are precut and drilled kits. Perhaps more imporant is attention to detail, like making sure you clean all of the crap out of a fuel tank before you Proseal it shut. 

It will be interesting to see how the homebuilding community addresses this problem, and I&#039;ll keep an eye on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Analysis requires accurate data, which no one is collecting. Maybe the growing accident rate will change this. Until now, most seemed content with anecdotal evidense and whet-finger estimations. </p>
<p>I, too, would like to see the break down between builder and second owner, and add those airplanes built by hired guns for pilots with more money than time. </p>
<p>Another interesting data point would be flight time, both total, last 30 to 90 days, and time in type. The old saw is that builders are too busy working to fly, until their project is done. </p>
<p>To be honest, mechanical ability doesn&#8217;t have a lot to do with building and airplane today because most of them are precut and drilled kits. Perhaps more imporant is attention to detail, like making sure you clean all of the crap out of a fuel tank before you Proseal it shut. </p>
<p>It will be interesting to see how the homebuilding community addresses this problem, and I&#8217;ll keep an eye on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Evans II</title>
		<link>http://www.jetwhine.com/2010/02/the-internet-homebuilt-aircraft-accidents/comment-page-1/#comment-125791</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Evans II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 04:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jetwhine.com/2010/02/the-internet-homebuilt-aircraft-accidents/#comment-125791</guid>
		<description>Excellent post!

One thing I would like to see analyzed is the experimental crash rate in builder/operator versus purchaser/operator incidents.  Personally, I wonder how many of these accidents are caused by pilots purchasing the &#039;hottest, fastest, newest&#039; homebuilt that was completed by someone else, thereby eliminating the working knowledge of the aircraft&#039;s construction and systems.  Another thing to think about is how many builders are, what you may call, mechanically-inclined or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post!</p>
<p>One thing I would like to see analyzed is the experimental crash rate in builder/operator versus purchaser/operator incidents.  Personally, I wonder how many of these accidents are caused by pilots purchasing the &#8216;hottest, fastest, newest&#8217; homebuilt that was completed by someone else, thereby eliminating the working knowledge of the aircraft&#8217;s construction and systems.  Another thing to think about is how many builders are, what you may call, mechanically-inclined or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.jetwhine.com @ 2012-02-08 18:05:55 -->
