What’s Aviation’s Future in a Polarized World?
By Scott Spangler on April 20th, 2012
At the World Aviation Training Symposium, held last week in Orlando, Boeing’s chief test & evaluation pilot for new airplane development, Mike Carriker, said the industry must modernize its educational methods and technology if it hopes to prepare pilots and technicians to “maximize the capabilities of today’s high technology airplanes.”
While aircraft and teaching technology have “evolved exponentially” over the past half century, aviation training has not progressed beyond the rote regurgitation of knowledge and skills that satisfy disassociated evaluation tasks. Few will disagree with his assessment that the industry must now employ modern methods and technology in competency-based training not only to make the global transportation efficient and economical, but “to reestablish the aviation industry as an attractive career option.”
Given our entrenched political, economic, and social polarization, there is little or no chance that the industry will make this needed transition. It matters little that, according to Boeing’s annual Pilot & Technician Outlook, that we must educate a million new pilots and technicians in the next 20 years. In the zero-sum game that is modern life, ideological preeminence is more than the common good.
The labels assigned to the diametric opponents is not important. Red or blue, liberal or conservative, rich or poor, have or have-not, what matters most is ultimate domination. And for one side to win, the other must lose. Despite their dueling delusions of the one perfect way, both sides share two common traits, hypocrisy and fluid self-interest. If you doubt this, watch The Daily Show, which satirizes each side’s all-or-nothing ethos.
Overcoming polarization, not to mention flying safely, requires two related skills no longer emphasized in American classrooms: critical thinking and complex reasoning. Teachers do not show students how to evaluate both sides of something and suss out their related causes and effects because they do not have time. They barely have time to pound the answers for prescribed assessment tests in their students’ rote memories.
Growing up in this educational environment encourages polarization because it teaches people to accept information from authoritative sources at face value. Absent critical thinking, they accept the source’s particular spin without question. A good example is the looming debate on federal student loan interest rate, which will double to 6.8% on July 1, if Congress does not act.
This is directly related to the modernization of aviation training, much of which is acquired through collegiate degree programs. The imbalance between a new pilot’s loan burden, which typically is in six figures, and the low five-figure starting pay, is a leading reason why the career’s appeal has been in decline. And aviation is not the only career suffering this malady.
Stemming the consequence of polarization and reversing their damage is a two-part process. Part one is investing the time and effort critical thinking-complex reasoning require. Part two is summoning the courage it takes to oppose our zero-sum culture and stand up for what’s right, not who’s right. This is no simple decision because it ensures retribution from both sides, but, as shown in The Emperor’s New Clothes, it is eventually effective.
Perhaps the most important question is this: is the future of aviation, and our society, important enough for us to stand up to both sides and speak our minds, to demand specific answers to difficult questions, and to hold decision-makers consistently accountable? –Scott Spangler
Related Posts:
Aviation Minute Via iTunes
April 24th, 2012 at 2:27 pm
Well written, well stated. I’ve been chanting this philosophy for some time. I even took it to another level in saying that if the America doesn’t change soon, one of two things happens: (1) We’ll see mass riots in the streets as has happened overseas. (2) Or we will see a rapid decline in the “American way of life”.
When the OCCUPY movement began, I thought it was that start of the first option taking hold. I was hopeful. But we see that has gone the way of the current “typical” way of life here in America. It was sensationalized for a bit, lip service was paid it, and mostly its gone now. A victim of its own lack of a central voice…a decision maker, a philosophical stand that was graspable.
This is the fate to be of our aviation industry as well. Particularly our G/A industry. Look at the outcome of several recent (past six years) airplane start-ups (Adams comes to mind). They were consumed by none US entities. Our educational process is also being consumed, by mediocrity and lack of efficient funding.
Its the fate of our overall country as the extraordinary wealth is continually constrained into the hands of an increasing few.
This results from a reality that our nation is not only polarized in its educational manner, but it has by nature of its educational and socialization manner become a nation of wealth consolidation rather than wealth creation.
Education, aviation, like everything else cost money, the result of which is a nation that worships wealth. The problem therefore becomes one of creating, rather than consolidating wealth. In that way we can afford to expend efficiently to employ. Likewise, then those that are employed with be able to afford to live as well.
This is what drives an economy. That is what creates an attractive career opportunity. And then the cycle repeats creating the where with all for an efficiently financed educational system.
April 24th, 2012 at 4:33 pm
Question: Did anyone ask Mr. Carriker how this ideology is to be funded and implemented? Will Boeing be paying for it all?
Show me the money.
April 24th, 2012 at 6:23 pm
William, in all the reports I was able to find about Mr. Carriker’s presentation, none of them reported any questions about the funding source for the improvements he addressed.
Really, in such situations I would not expect the rest of the story, and unless an old-school journalist is present, I would exepct no questions seeking the rest of the story.
Out politicians, busines leaders, and other officials have conditioned us to accept such one-sided presentations that accomplish nothing more than making them look smart, informed, and caring.